Gap created the new logo (on the left) in an attempt to update Gap for the new generation. However, there was so much negative reaction to the attempted change that Gap agreed to return to the old logo. The conversation was not only between members of the public, but between the public and the owners of Gap. Everyone had an opinion on the new logo and wanted to share it via the web; in turn, the owners of Gap listened to their buyers. The mass uproar also demonstrates how much investment people make in brands: one woman said she would no longer shop at Gap if the logo changed. In my opinion, the discussion this change created was good for Gap's business; no matter whether people liked or disliked the logo, the brand was getting noticed.
The conversation of fashion design is ever-changing as well: take Lady Gaga's meat dress that has accumulated so much attention.
Lady Gaga purposely creates looks that garner attention, she wants people to be shocked and discuss the meaning behind her ensembles. The meat dress in particular was a comment on the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy in the military. She says, "If we don't stand up for what we believe in, we don't fight for our rights, pretty soon we're gonna have as much rights as the meat on our bones." She also added that she's "not a piece of meat". She creates her image in a way that invites controversy, that invites a discussion of what statements she makes with her outfits. In doing so, she creates awareness of social issues; rather than only promoting her own fame, she makes an effort to reach out and help her supporters. Her conversations are with the media, challenging our social norms.


wow, we talked about the same stuff! We be so very very wise, eh?
ReplyDelete